Unified client brief
Generated 2026-11-01 · your performance + public discourse, in one place
Your data
Your own campaign data from the append-only event store. Every figure is workspace-scoped; the only cross-client figures are platform benchmarks, pooled through the governed aggregate gateway and shown only where the cohort keeps every campaign unidentifiable.
Weekly brief
Week of 2026-10-27
6 of 14 plan tasks complete (42.9%).
Every count is reproduced from the append-only event store.
| Channel | Touches |
|---|---|
| phone | 50 |
| text | 883 |
| 80 | |
| 40 |
| Response | Count |
|---|---|
| disposition | 50 |
| inbound reply | 217 |
| opt out | 3 |
| reply code | 122 |
| sentiment code | 8 |
Phone contact rate: 40.0% (20 reached / 50 dial attempts).
Inbound replies classified deterministic-rules-first, then model-assisted; anything uncertain is routed to human review and shown as its own band, never a confident label.
Your rate beside the platform benchmark for comparable campaigns (same race type and region), pooled through the governed gateway. A benchmark appears only once the cohort is large enough to keep every campaign unidentifiable; below that it reads "not enough comparable campaigns yet" rather than a small-n number.
| Metric | Your rate | Benchmark | Cohort |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contact rate | 100.0% | 26.9% | 6 |
| Reply rate | 22.5% | 24.1% | 6 |
| Opt-out rate | 0.3% | 4.6% | 6 |
| Conversion to support | 13.9% | 48.3% | 6 |
Each experiment pre-registers its metric and holds out a randomized control. A "no measurable difference" is reported as a first-class result, never spun as a win.
Status: analyzed
Measured lift: treatment 34.1% vs holdout 16.2%, an absolute lift of 17.9% (95% CI 9.4% to 26.4%, p=0.000, n=270/130).
Status: analyzed
No measurable difference on the pre-registered metric: treatment 20.1% vs holdout 19.8% — the 95% confidence interval for the difference (-8.3% to 8.8%) includes zero (p=0.957, n=279/121). Reported as a no measurable difference result, not a win.
Advice derived from your own event data. Every suggestion carries its evidence — your data, a gateway benchmark where the cohort permits, and a narrative signal where one is present — never an unexplained score.
Your text channel earns replies at 24.6% versus 0.0% for email. Move marginal volume and budget from email toward text, then re-measure.
Why:
The "warm-intro" variant earns support-coded replies at 30.0% versus 10.0% for "issue-forward". Make "warm-intro" the default and test a fresh challenger against it.
Why:
Public discourse
The public discourse landscape, assembled from the monitored public corpus — narratives, topics, and sources, never individuals. Model-assisted signals show their measured accuracy and every item links to its public sources; this is not your data and does not mix with it.
Weekly brief
2026-10-24 → 2026-10-31
Generated 2026-11-01 · model-assisted, 100% agreement on sampled review
The narratives active in this space, ranked by recent volume and resonance. Each is a narrative/topic/source cluster — never a person — and links back to the public sources that carry it.
model-assisted, 100% agreement on sampled review
model-assisted, 100% agreement on sampled review
model-assisted, 100% agreement on sampled review
Aggregate public-discourse sentiment over time. Uncertain classifications route to human review and show as their own band, never a confident label.
Mean resonance (0–1) over time, from the documented resonance formula stored on each record. Resonance measures how much a narrative is spreading, not whether it is true.
How Transit: farecap, pilot, across moved across public sources over time: origination (the earliest source) then amplification. Every step is a source, never a person, and links to its corpus records.
model-assisted extraction
model-assisted extraction
model-assisted extraction
model-assisted extraction
model-assisted extraction
model-assisted extraction
model-assisted extraction
model-assisted extraction
model-assisted extraction
model-assisted extraction
model-assisted extraction
For each key claim, what reputable sources report on the same topic — linked, dated, and sourced. This is sourced context, not a judgment: there is no truth score, rating, or verdict on any claim or speaker, and where sources disagree, both sides are shown.
Sourced context, not a judgment: this shows what reputable sources report on the same topic, with their dates and outlets, so you can see the range of reporting and click through. Where sources disagree, both sides are shown below — you decide.
Range of reporting
A one-year fare-cap pilot would trade a modest revenue dip for higher ridership, per a review of the city's published budget documents. Supporters and skeptics both cited the same figures to opposite ends.
Officials from Demoville and neighboring Riverton opened talks on a shared transit authority that would coordinate bus schedules and pool maintenance costs, according to a joint statement.
The transit fare-cap pilot drew new debate as riders and the council weighed the transit budget. The fare-cap pilot and the new bus routes stayed the focus across Demoville transit meetings this week.
The transit fare-cap pilot drew new debate as riders and the council weighed the transit budget. The fare-cap pilot and the new bus routes stayed the focus across Demoville transit meetings this week.
The transit fare-cap pilot drew new debate as riders and the council weighed the transit budget. The fare-cap pilot and the new bus routes stayed the focus across Demoville transit meetings this week.
The transit fare-cap pilot drew new debate as riders and the council weighed the transit budget. The fare-cap pilot and the new bus routes stayed the focus across Demoville transit meetings this week.
The transit fare-cap pilot drew new debate as riders and the council weighed the transit budget. The fare-cap pilot and the new bus routes stayed the focus across Demoville transit meetings this week.
The transit fare-cap pilot drew new debate as riders and the council weighed the transit budget. The fare-cap pilot and the new bus routes stayed the focus across Demoville transit meetings this week.